My fellow teachers: Are you transmitting wisdom or are you explaining it?
December 9, 2013 | 19 Comments
{teaching mudra}
The other day I was involved in a conversation with three other women who speak publicly. One of them brought up the notion of “transmission.” Rather than giving just another how-to talk, she said, she wanted to transmit something of value. Words are useful, she continued, but authentic presence is more instructive.
I agree. But there is a conundrum. What do you transmit? Where does it come from? How can you find it, feel it, and then offer it? And how can you bring it to a public forum where people have shown up hoping to gain something of value? What do you put in your event marketing materials? “Show up and see Susan transmit something that she promises will help you” is not going to work.
These questions are at the very heart of what it means to be a spiritual teacher. As one who has been trained very carefully to teach meditation (and only after more than a decade of practice and months and months of meditation retreats), it was pointed out that meditation instruction is more than a simple explanation. It is a transmission. The “transmission quality” ensures, perhaps, that the instruction is received by both your wisdom mind and your conventional mind. Your wisdom mind (or higher self, soul, spirit, whatever you would like to call it) uses the instruction to deepen whatever dialogue(s) you’re having in unseen realms—with relatives, heroes, sages, Self, or who knows what. (But we all have such inner dialogues.) Your conventional mind uses the instruction to lower your blood pressure, treat insomnia, or just be less stressed out. Both are important.
In a transmission, something generates a signal. Something else conducts it. When most of us think about transmitting, we forget about that all-important first step: something generates a signal. In other words, the signal does not start with me yet it cannot be conducted without me. Lots (and lots) of trouble ensues when the conductor confuses herself with the signal. But I digress.
Though this may sound impossibly woo-woo, I’m going to step out here and advocate the traditional view. The signal comes from your lineage. If you are Buddhist, as I am, the signal comes from the Buddha or Manjushri or Padmasambhava. If you’re Christian, the signal comes from God, Jesus, or the Holy Ghost. If you’re Jewish, perhaps it comes from YHWH, Maimonides, Moses or the Lubavitcha Rebbe. And so on.
However, most of us don’t hold with established religions—are transmissions out of our reach? Certainly not. Whether you think of it in this way or not, you definitely hold a lineage. Think of the beings you most admire. Think of the values you hold the highest. Think of the people with whom you feel most at ease. These are your lineages. Maybe your lineage is songwriters and you revere Bob Dylan, Willie Dixon, and Nick Lowe. Or perhaps you’re of the lineage of scientists and you esteem Einstein, Newton, and Nikola Tesla. Maybe you’re of the lineage of people who have no lineage, of loners and cowboys and outlaws. Your lineage could be that of mothers, Italians, activists, gardeners, executives, or simply your immediate family. These all work. (BTW, if you are so moved, in the comments, tell me what your lineage is and who your lineage holders are…)
Before you teach, it is enormously helpful, critical, even, to invoke the power of your lineage. If you’re a traditionalist like me, there are prescribed ways of doing so via spiritual practices. But it is just as good to simply think of those you admire the most and hope to emulate. Bring them to mind. That’s all you have to do. But if you want to take it a step further, say to them in whatever way feels comfortable something like, “I hold your lineage and I’ll try to do you proud by extending what you started.”
Before I teach meditation for example, I think of my meditation teacher (with unending gratitude, I might add). He was taught by his meditation teacher (in this case, Chogyam Trungpa). Chogyam Trunpga was taught by his teacher who was taught by his teacher who was taught by her teacher…and on and on. There is an unbroken line of transmission all the way back to the Buddha. When I am about to teach, reflecting on this gives me tremendous ease.
This is how the transmission quality arises. I mean, it’s one way. I’m sure there are others.
Some years ago, I was producing a book with a CD called “Quiet Mind.” It was intended to introduce people to various kinds of meditation through essays written by some of the greatest teachers in the world. The CD featured each of them teaching the practice they had written about. Before I began work on it, I went to visit my teacher, Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche. I didn’t know if the transmission quality could be preserved on a recording! I asked him if it was possible. After thinking it over very briefly, he said “yes” and then offered me a formula for transmission that I have abided by ever since.
“When you are trying to teach something spiritual,” he said, “the first step is to establish confidence in the mind of the student.” Which makes total sense, because then the student can actually relax and open her mind to what you are saying and spiritual teachings are confusing enough without hearing them through a partially clenched mind.
“How do you establish confidence?” he continued. Step two! “Offer something real.” Yes! “And how do you know what is ‘real’?” he said, whereupon he laid step three on me. “Only that which you yourself know to be true via your personal experience.” In other words, not what someone else told you, not what you hope is true, not what other really cool people think is true. What YOU know.
I have tried to abide by this 3-step system for more than a decade since I first heard it. I have found it to be extremely reliable. So, as you go out there hoping to teach anyone anything whether through public discourse or private instruction, via the written or the spoken word, remember your lineage. Then establish confidence by offering something real based solely on your experiential wisdom. This way, I have learned, the signal remains strong and the conduit becomes ever stronger. You are able then to transmit in the best possible way: again, in the words of Sakyong Mipham who said to a gathering of dharma teachers, “don’t teach anyone anything. Help them to discover something.”
categorized in: dharma
19 Comments
This is very interesting to consider. When I was teaching, I remember discovering that I had an outpouring of love for my students. I loved them profoundly. It overflowed out of me. Everything I did was an act of love, even when I was tough. At that time, I came to believe that teaching itself stems from the most genuine love. However, I know now that it is not that way for all teachers. Thinking about that love makes me miss teaching. A lot.
I have not considered from whence that love came, or about any type of lineage. I would say the three steps definitely apply to traditional classroom teaching. Do you think lineage does as well?
I love this point of view. You must be a wonderful teacher. There is something so magical about teaching… Yes, I think lineage applies to pretty much everything.
Thank you. The timing of this is actually very funny. I have just begun the process of returning to teaching last week. I will be thinking about the aspect of lineage.
I hope it will be instructive and nourishing for you.
This could not have come at a more appropriate time for me–thank you Susan! I’m scheduled to give a speech in two days which is supposed to inspire my audience… and it’s an audience that has inspired me and is much wiser than me in many ways.
Though I’m still nervous about the prospect of doing so, I feel a little more confident knowing that I have my lineages (family, human-beings, you (yep :), and probably more…) and that I can find something real in my own experience that I can share that might be of help in the process of discovery. Thanks Susan….
You are so welcome and may the energy of all those who have supported you speak through you and with you.
Wonderful post! I have long struggled with conflicted feelings regarding the well-intended tendency of people to dispense advice (myself included), particularly in the blog-o-sphere. But at the same time I have felt compelled to share my exploration of personal philosophy, values and sense of the spiritual life. The encouragement to own and speak solely from my base of experiential wisdom is, therefore, liberating and affirming. Thanks so much for that.
In answer to the question of lineage I would have to say mine is that of mavericks, loners and outsiders–poets of almost any persuasion, Care of the Soul authour Thomas Moore, Tolstoy, Gandhi, musicians and artists etc. In short, charting my own course seems to be the calling.
I love this, Audrey. And your lineage holders are magnificent. It’s interesting how connecting with them helps as long as we don’t try to emulate them or mimic them. Rather, if we stay with our version of truth, their presence in our life seems to grow stronger.
For lineage, Wilfred Bion came to mind for me. I like your point about not mimicking, I see too much of that, adopting the accent or clothing style of the teacher.
It can be difficult to tell how and when to declare our own style, knowledge, and so on.
Thank you for this wisdom, Susan – I have struggled with so much self doubt as a (yoga) teacher – questioned my ability and my ‘right’ to be consider myself worthy to teach. But your post speaks to me and inspires me to consider myself a messenger, a sharer of knowledge, a link in a long line of teachers, passing on a message in the hope that what I share will help in the same way that my teachers have helped me. Thank you <3
I am so glad to hear this, Kathleen.
This is so fascinating to read, Susan, because I realize this is happening when I teach and speak and write…I transmit…it comes through my body, my breath. My lineage? I do not have one religion, but what I now see is that my lineage is the dark, the void, the bubbling emergent, the ripe, the sensual, the earth – Creation at the edge of unfolding. That’s the only way I can describe it with words, but I can feel it as I type. This is very helpful. Thank you.
This is beautiful…
this article came to me in such a timely fashion (as things do). i just purchased a book of inspirational poems/stories by dorothy hunt, and one of the sections is about transmission. i shared a poem from that section in one of my classes last night, still not entirely understanding the idea of transmission.. but the poem seemed to fulfill it’s purpose, and we had a great practice. this article speaks directly to my understanding of transmission through lineage – and i’m proud to cite teachers like stevie lake, who led me to gioconda parker and eventually christina sell. as my teachers, every one of their teachers becomes part of my lineage as well, and i can only hope to transmit the truth and authenticity that each of them offers and inspires each time they take to the mat to teach. X thanks for this.
Lineage – actually transmitted lineage, NOT imagined or appropriated lineage with no personal relationships to create feedback – is most excellent insurance against bullshit.
The compounding of these pimple treatment ingredients has the capability to minimize oil generated by the skin. If
an individual has longer hair, then try to prevent it from touching a person’s skin. Not only will
it cause more pimples to pop out later, but it will also leave a permanent pimple scar.